{"id":1082574,"date":"2025-04-17T09:22:28","date_gmt":"2025-04-17T09:22:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gpdstore.net\/gpd-win-4-2025-vs-gpd-win-mini-2025-ktory-je-pre-vas-najlepsi\/"},"modified":"2025-05-07T08:50:47","modified_gmt":"2025-05-07T08:50:47","slug":"gpd-win-4-2025-vs-gpd-win-mini-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gpdstore.net\/sk\/blog\/gpd-win-4-2025-vs-gpd-win-mini-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"GPD WIN 4 2025 vs. GPD WIN Mini 2025 – ktor\u00fd je pre v\u00e1s najlep\u0161\u00ed?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Spolo\u010dnos\u0165 GPD pokra\u010duje v trende osvie\u017eovania svojich popul\u00e1rnych vreckov\u00fdch hern\u00fdch po\u010d\u00edta\u010dov a v roku 2025 n\u00e1m prin\u00e1\u0161a aktualizovan\u00e9 verzie GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> a GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a>. Obe zariadenia s\u00fa teraz vybaven\u00e9 v\u00fdkonn\u00fdm procesorom AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, ktor\u00fd s\u013eubuje v\u00fdrazn\u00e9 zv\u00fd\u0161enie v\u00fdkonu oproti predch\u00e1dzaj\u00facim gener\u00e1ci\u00e1m. Hoci maj\u00fa rovnak\u00fd v\u00fdpo\u010dtov\u00fd v\u00fdkon jadra, ich odli\u0161n\u00e9 tvarov\u00e9 faktory, funkcie a jemn\u00e9 v\u00fdkonnostn\u00e9 rozdiely vyhovuj\u00fa r\u00f4znym preferenci\u00e1m pou\u017e\u00edvate\u013eov. <\/p>\n\n

\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 a GPD WIN Mini 2025 porovnanie ve\u013ekosti<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

V tomto \u010dl\u00e1nku porovn\u00e1vame GPD WIN 4 2025 vs. GPD WIN Mini 2025, aby sme v\u00e1m pomohli ur\u010di\u0165, ktor\u00fd prenosn\u00fd hern\u00fd po\u010d\u00edta\u010d je lep\u0161\u00ed pre va\u0161e potreby. Preberieme ich fyzick\u00e9 vlastnosti vr\u00e1tane ve\u013ekosti, hmotnosti, displejov a ovl\u00e1dac\u00edch prvkov. Presk\u00famame aj ich technick\u00e9 \u0161pecifik\u00e1cie, porovnanie v\u00fdkonu na z\u00e1klade poskytnut\u00fdch recenzi\u00ed, kompatibilitu s eGPU a na z\u00e1ver uvedieme z\u00e1vere\u010dn\u00e9 my\u0161lienky o tom, ktor\u00e9 zariadenie by pre v\u00e1s mohlo by\u0165 vhodnej\u0161ie. <\/p>\n

<\/div>\"GPD

GPD WIN 4 2025 Hern\u00fd prenosn\u00fd po\u010d\u00edta\u010d<\/h2>
797,94 €<\/span><\/span> –<\/span> 1.129,26 €<\/span><\/span>Price range: 797,94 € through 1.129,26 €<\/span><\/div>
\n\n
\n
Nakupujte teraz<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

Form\u00e1t, displej a ovl\u00e1dacie prvky<\/h2>\n\n

Najpriamej\u0161\u00ed rozdiel spo\u010d\u00edva v ich dizajne. GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> si zachov\u00e1va svoj zn\u00e1my kompaktn\u00fd, posuvn\u00fd dizajn, ktor\u00fd pripom\u00edna star\u0161ie prenosn\u00e9 konzoly. M\u00e1 rozmery pribli\u017ene 6 x 3,6 x 1,1 palca a hmotnos\u0165 598 g. Jeho 6-palcov\u00fd displej s rozl\u00ed\u0161en\u00edm 1080P H-IPS sa vys\u00fava a odkr\u00fdva mal\u00fa kl\u00e1vesnicu QWERTY vhodn\u00fa na p\u00edsanie palcom. Ovl\u00e1dacie prvky s\u00fa vybaven\u00e9 \u0161tandardn\u00fdmi dvoma anal\u00f3gov\u00fdmi p\u00e1\u010dkami, D-padom, hern\u00fdmi tla\u010didlami, ramenn\u00fdmi\/tla\u010didlami sp\u00fa\u0161te, sn\u00edma\u010dom odtla\u010dkov prstov a jedine\u010dnou optickou my\u0161ou s prstami. <\/p>\n\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN Ovl\u00e1dacie prvky Mini 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 Ovl\u00e1dacie prvky<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n

Naopak, GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> m\u00e1 kon\u0161trukciu typu clamshell (flip), ktor\u00e1 pripom\u00edna miniat\u00farny notebook. Je o nie\u010do v\u00e4\u010d\u0161\u00ed, ale \u013eah\u0161\u00ed ako WIN 4, m\u00e1 rozmery 6,7 x 4,2 x 1 palca a v\u00e1\u017ei 555 g. Po otvoren\u00ed veka sa odhal\u00ed v\u00e4\u010d\u0161\u00ed 7-palcov\u00fd dotykov\u00fd displej LTPS s vy\u0161\u0161ou obnovovacou frekvenciou 120 Hz, VRR a podporou technol\u00f3gie AMD FreeSync. Pod obrazovkou sa nach\u00e1dzaj\u00fa hern\u00e9 ovl\u00e1dacie prvky (dve p\u00e1\u010dky, D-pad, tla\u010didl\u00e1) lemuj\u00face centr\u00e1lny touchpad (neklikate\u013en\u00fd) a kompaktn\u00e1 kl\u00e1vesnica, ktor\u00e1 sa najlep\u0161ie hod\u00ed aj na kr\u00e1tke p\u00edsanie. <\/p>\n\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 Kl\u00e1vesnica<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN Kl\u00e1vesnica Mini 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n

V\u00e4\u010d\u0161ia obrazovka s vy\u0161\u0161ou obnovovacou frekvenciou je hlavnou v\u00fdhodou po\u010d\u00edta\u010da Mini, zatia\u013e \u010do integrovan\u00e1 optick\u00e1 my\u0161 po\u010d\u00edta\u010da WIN 4 pon\u00faka alternat\u00edvny sp\u00f4sob zad\u00e1vania \u00fadajov. Pri zva\u017eovan\u00ed kompaktn\u00e9ho hern\u00e9ho po\u010d\u00edta\u010da hraj\u00fa tieto kon\u0161truk\u010dn\u00e9 rozdiely ve\u013ek\u00fa \u00falohu pri pou\u017eite\u013enosti. <\/p>\n\n

Technick\u00e9 \u0161pecifik\u00e1cie<\/h2>\n\n

Modely GPD WIN 4 2025 aj GPD WIN Mini 2025 vyu\u017e\u00edvaj\u00fa najnov\u0161\u00ed procesor AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 v spojen\u00ed s grafikou AMD Radeon 890M. Model GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> je vybaven\u00fd 32 GB opera\u010dnej pam\u00e4te LPDDR5x a mo\u017enos\u0165ami 1 TB, 2 TB alebo 4 TB NVMe SSD (ve\u013ekos\u0165 2280). <\/p>\n\n

\n
\"Spyro<\/a>
Spyro Reignited Trilogy na GPD WIN 4 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"Palworld<\/a>
Palworld na GPD WIN MINI 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n

GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> pon\u00faka 16 GB alebo 32 GB LPDDR5x RAM a dod\u00e1va sa s 1 TB, 2 TB alebo 4 TB \u00falo\u017eiskom SSD, ktor\u00e9 tie\u017e vyu\u017e\u00edva form\u00e1t 2280 NVMe. Obe zariadenia podporuj\u00fa Wi-Fi 6E a Bluetooth 5.3 na pripojenie, \u010do z nich rob\u00ed ve\u013emi schopn\u00e9 mobiln\u00e9 hern\u00e9 PC. <\/p>\n\n

<\/td>GPD WIN 4 2025<\/strong><\/td>GPD WIN MINI 2025<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
CPU<\/strong><\/td>AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370<\/a>, 12 jadier, 14 vl\u00e1kien do 5,1 GHz<\/td>AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 12 jadier, 14 vl\u00e1kien do 5,1 GHz<\/td><\/tr>
GPU<\/strong><\/td>AMD Radeon 890M a\u017e do 2 900 MHz<\/td>AMD Radeon 890M<\/a> a\u017e do 2 900 MHz<\/td><\/tr>
RAM<\/strong><\/td>32 GB<\/a> LPDDR5X<\/td>16 GB alebo 32 GB LPDDR5X<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
SKLADOVANIE<\/strong><\/td>1 TB<\/a>, 2 TB alebo 4 TB<\/a> NVME PCIE 4.0 2280<\/td>2 TB<\/a> alebo 4 TB NVME PCIE 4.0<\/a> 2280<\/td><\/tr>
DISPLAY<\/strong><\/td>6\u2033 dotykov\u00fd displej H-IPS<\/a>, rozl\u00ed\u0161enie a\u017e 1920×1080, 40 Hz a 60 Hz, 368 PPI<\/td>7″ dotykov\u00fd displej LTPS<\/a>, rozl\u00ed\u0161enie a\u017e 1920 \u00d7 1080, 120 Hz, 16:9, 299 PPI<\/td><\/tr>
KOMUNIK\u00c1CIA<\/strong><\/td>Wi-Fi 6E<\/a>Bluetooth 5.3<\/td>Wi-Fi 6EBluetooth 5.3<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
V\/V<\/strong><\/td>1x USB4 Type-C<\/a>1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C 1x Oculink<\/a>1x Slot na kartu Micro SD1x 3,5 mm port pre sl\u00fachadl\u00e1<\/td>1x USB 4.0 typu C1x USB typu C 3.2 Gen2<\/a>1x USB typu A 3.2 Gen21x slot na kartu Micro SD1x 3,5 mm port na sl\u00fachadl\u00e1<\/td><\/tr>
BAT\u00c9RIA<\/strong><\/td>45,62Wh nab\u00edjate\u013en\u00e1 bat\u00e9ria<\/td>44,24Wh nab\u00edjate\u013en\u00e1 bat\u00e9ria<\/td><\/tr>
VE\u013dKOS\u0164<\/strong><\/td>6 x 3,6 x 1,1 palca \/ 22,0 x 9,2 x 2,8 cm<\/td>6,7 x 4,2 x 1 palec \/ 17,2 x 10,9 x 2,7 cm<\/td><\/tr>
WEIGHT<\/strong><\/td>598 g \/ 1,31 libry<\/td>555 g \/ 1,2 libry<\/td><\/tr>
K\u00daPI\u0164<\/strong><\/td>TU<\/a><\/td>TU<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n

Porovnanie \u017eivotnosti bat\u00e9rie, hlu\u010dnosti ventil\u00e1tora a teploty<\/h2>\n\n

Pokia\u013e ide o v\u00fddr\u017e bat\u00e9rie pri ve\u013ekej z\u00e1\u0165a\u017ei (spusten\u00e1 slu\u010dka Cinebench pri 28 W TDP, pln\u00fd jas), WIN 4 vydr\u017eal so svojou 45,62Wh bat\u00e9riou pribli\u017ene 57 min\u00fat. WIN Mini so 44,2Wh bat\u00e9riou zvl\u00e1dol za rovnak\u00fdch podmienok o nie\u010do dlh\u0161ie 1 hodinu a 8 min\u00fat. Priemern\u00e1 v\u00fddr\u017e bat\u00e9rie pri pou\u017e\u00edvan\u00ed sa v pr\u00edpade oboch zariaden\u00ed odhaduje na 3 a\u017e 6 hod\u00edn v z\u00e1vislosti od pracovn\u00e9ho za\u0165a\u017eenia. <\/p>\n\n

\n
\"GPD
GPD WIN 4 2025 teplota<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"GPD
GPD WIN Teplota MINI 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n

Pri tepeln\u00fdch testoch a testoch hlu\u010dnosti po\u010das testov Cinebench dosiahli obe zariadenia maxim\u00e1lnu hlu\u010dnos\u0165 ventil\u00e1tora 64 dB. WIN 4 zaznamenal maxim\u00e1lnu teplotu 45 \u00b0C, zatia\u013e \u010do WIN Mini dosiahol vy\u0161\u0161iu teplotu 55 \u00b0C. Tieto \u00fadaje s\u00fa d\u00f4le\u017eit\u00e9 pri v\u00fdbere vreckov\u00e9ho hern\u00e9ho po\u010d\u00edta\u010da na dlh\u00e9 sedenia. <\/p>\n\n

GPD WIN 4 2025 vs. GPD WIN Mini 2025 – porovn\u00e1vacie testy<\/h2>\n\n

Zatia\u013e \u010do GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> vs. GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> maj\u00fa rovnak\u00fd \u010dipset, rozdiely v kon\u0161trukcii chladenia, nap\u00e1jan\u00ed a celkovom tvare m\u00f4\u017eu vies\u0165 k jemn\u00fdm, ale v\u00fdrazn\u00fdm rozdielom vo v\u00fdkone. Aby sme v\u00e1m pomohli rozhodn\u00fa\u0165 sa, ktor\u00e9 zariadenie najlep\u0161ie vyhovuje va\u0161im potreb\u00e1m v oblasti hier alebo produktivity, porovnali sme oba modely v celom rade syntetick\u00fdch testov a re\u00e1lnych hern\u00fdch scen\u00e1rov. Ni\u017e\u0161ie n\u00e1jdete preh\u013ead v\u00fdkonov jednotliv\u00fdch zariaden\u00ed v \u00faloh\u00e1ch n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u00fdch na procesor, grafick\u00fdch benchmarkoch a n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u00fdch hr\u00e1ch AAA, ako s\u00fa Cyberpunk 2077 a Forza Horizon 5. <\/p>\n\n

Geekbench 6 <\/h3>\n\n

GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> mierne prekon\u00e1va WIN 4 2025 v Geekbench 6. V jednojadrov\u00fdch testoch dosiahol 2900 bodov a vo viacjadrov\u00fdch 13 256 bodov v porovnan\u00ed s 2884 bodmi WIN 4 a 12 419 bodmi WIN 4. Tento mal\u00fd n\u00e1skok nazna\u010duje mierne lep\u0161\u00ed hrub\u00fd v\u00fdkon procesora, najm\u00e4 vo viacvl\u00e1knov\u00fdch aplik\u00e1ci\u00e1ch. Pre ka\u017ed\u00e9ho, kto chce na prenosnom hernom po\u010d\u00edta\u010di vykon\u00e1va\u0165 \u00falohy n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u00e9 na procesor, m\u00f4\u017ee ma\u0165 WIN Mini mal\u00fa v\u00fdhodu. <\/p>\n\n

\"Porovnanie<\/a>
Porovnanie benchmarkov Geekbench 6<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

3DMARK \u010casov\u00fd \u0161pi\u00f3n, No\u010dn\u00fd n\u00e1jazd a Ohniv\u00fd \u00fader<\/h3>\n\n

V benchmarkoch 3DMARK vedie WIN Mini 2025 v Time Spy (3879 vs. 3762), ale GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> \u0165ah\u00e1 za krat\u0161\u00ed koniec v Night Raid (31627 vs. 28959) a Fire Strike (8455 vs. 7793). To poukazuje na mierny kompromis, ke\u010f Mini vynik\u00e1 v modern\u00fdch \u00faloh\u00e1ch DirectX 12 (Time Spy), zatia\u013e \u010do WIN 4 dosahuje lep\u0161ie v\u00fdsledky v rozmanitej\u0161\u00edch alebo star\u0161\u00edch grafick\u00fdch \u00faloh\u00e1ch. Bez oh\u013eadu na to oba vystupuj\u00fa ako schopn\u00e9 kompaktn\u00e9 hern\u00e9 po\u010d\u00edta\u010de. <\/p>\n\n

\"Porovnanie<\/a>
Porovnanie referen\u010dn\u00fdch hodn\u00f4t 3DMARK<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

Cinebench 2024<\/h3>\n\n

V teste Cinebench 2024 prekon\u00e1va WIN 4 Mini v testoch s jedn\u00fdm jadrom (117 vs. 114) aj s viacer\u00fdmi jadrami (951 vs. 849). To nazna\u010duje, \u017ee WIN 4 m\u00f4\u017ee ma\u0165 mal\u00fa v\u00fdhodu v kreat\u00edvnych \u00faloh\u00e1ch n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u00fdch na procesor, ako je renderovanie alebo k\u00f3dovanie, oproti GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a>. T\u00ed, ktor\u00ed h\u013eadaj\u00fa mobiln\u00fd hern\u00fd po\u010d\u00edta\u010d, ktor\u00fd sl\u00fa\u017ei aj ako n\u00e1stroj na zv\u00fd\u0161enie produktivity, m\u00f4\u017eu uprednostni\u0165 WIN 4. <\/p>\n\n

\"Porovnanie<\/a>
Porovnanie benchmarkov Cinebench 2024<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

Forza Horizon 5<\/h3>\n\n

Pri 1080P 28W dosahuje WIN Mini 115 FPS oproti 112 FPS na WIN 4. Pri rozl\u00ed\u0161en\u00ed 720P 28 W sa rozdiel mierne zv\u00e4\u010d\u0161uje, pri\u010dom Mini dosahuje 156 FPS oproti 149 FPS WIN 4. Rozdiel je mal\u00fd, ale konzistentn\u00fd, v\u010faka \u010domu m\u00e1 GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> mierny n\u00e1skok vo v\u00fdkone v z\u00e1vodn\u00fdch hr\u00e1ch vo v\u0161etk\u00fdch rozl\u00ed\u0161eniach. Tento mal\u00fd n\u00e1skok m\u00f4\u017ee oslovi\u0165 t\u00fdch, ktor\u00ed h\u013eadaj\u00fa citliv\u00fd a plynul\u00fd prenosn\u00fd hern\u00fd po\u010d\u00edta\u010d. <\/p>\n\n

\"Porovnanie<\/a>
Porovnanie benchmarkov hry Forza Horizon 5<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

Shadow of the Tomb Raider<\/h3>\n\n

Obe zariadenia maj\u00fa zhodne 87 FPS v rozl\u00ed\u0161en\u00ed 1080P 28W. Pri 720P 28W v\u0161ak WIN Mini dosahuje 117 FPS, \u010d\u00edm tesne predbieha WIN 4 so 115 FPS. Zatia\u013e \u010do hranie pri vy\u0161\u0161\u00edch nastaveniach je rovnocenn\u00e9, WIN Mini op\u00e4\u0165 vykazuje margin\u00e1lny n\u00e1rast pri ni\u017e\u0161\u00edch rozl\u00ed\u0161eniach. Tak\u00e9to v\u00ed\u0165azstv\u00e1 v po\u010dte sn\u00edmok za sekundu m\u00f4\u017eu ovplyvni\u0165 v\u00e1\u0161 v\u00fdber pri porovn\u00e1van\u00ed GPD WIN 4 2025 a GPD WIN Mini 2025. <\/p>\n\n

\"Porovnanie<\/a>
Porovnanie benchmarkov hry Shadow of the Tomb Raider<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

Cyberpunk 2077<\/h3>\n\n

V hre Cyberpunk 2077 s rozl\u00ed\u0161en\u00edm 1080P a v\u00fdkonom 28 W s\u00fa obe zariadenia prakticky identick\u00e9 (48,19 FPS pre WIN 4 oproti 48,05 FPS pre WIN Mini). Pri rozl\u00ed\u0161en\u00ed 720P 28W m\u00e1 WIN Mini jasnej\u0161ie vedenie so 72,61 FPS v porovnan\u00ed s 69,8 FPS na GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a>. Efektivita GPU po\u010d\u00edta\u010da Mini sa jav\u00ed o nie\u010do lep\u0161ia pri ni\u017e\u0161\u00edch rozl\u00ed\u0161eniach v n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u00fdch tituloch, \u010do posil\u0148uje jeho status v\u00fdkonn\u00e9ho vreckov\u00e9ho hern\u00e9ho po\u010d\u00edta\u010da. <\/p>\n\n

\"Porovnanie<\/a>
Porovnanie benchmarkov Cyberpunk 2077<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
<\/div>\"Hern\u00fd

Hern\u00fd prenosn\u00fd po\u010d\u00edta\u010d GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/h2>
1.146,84 €<\/span><\/span> –<\/span> 2.272,63 €<\/span><\/span>Price range: 1.146,84 € through 2.272,63 €<\/span><\/div>
\n\n
\n
Nakupujte teraz<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

Zhrnutie referen\u010dnej hodnoty<\/h2>\n\n

Celkovo s\u00fa v\u00fdsledky porovn\u00e1vac\u00edch testov medzi GPD WIN 4 2025 a GPD WIN Mini 2025 ve\u013emi tesn\u00e9, pri\u010dom ani jedno zariadenie nem\u00e1 vo v\u0161etk\u00fdch testoch jednozna\u010dn\u00fd n\u00e1skok. WIN Mini vyk\u00e1zal o nie\u010do lep\u0161ie v\u00fdsledky s\u00favisiace s GPU v modern\u00fdch tituloch a syntetick\u00fdch grafick\u00fdch testoch, ako je 3DMark Time Spy a hranie hier v ni\u017e\u0161\u00edch rozl\u00ed\u0161eniach,. Zatia\u013e \u010do GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> si udr\u017eal svoju poz\u00edciu s vy\u0161\u0161\u00edm v\u00fdkonom viacjadrov\u00e9ho CPU v benchmarkoch Cinebench a 3DMark. <\/p>\n\n

\n
\"Vita3K<\/a>
Vita3K na GPD WIN 4 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN MINI 2025 RPCS3<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n

V re\u00e1lnych hern\u00fdch scen\u00e1roch, ako s\u00fa Cyberpunk 2077 a Forza Horizon 5, boli rozdiely zanedbate\u013en\u00e9 a pri ka\u017edodennom pou\u017e\u00edvan\u00ed by si ich pravdepodobne nikto nev\u0161imol. V kone\u010dnom d\u00f4sledku obe zariadenia poskytuj\u00fa vynikaj\u00faci v\u00fdkon a s pomocou ladiaceho softv\u00e9ru, ako je Handheld Companion<\/a>, m\u00f4\u017eu pou\u017e\u00edvatelia optimalizova\u0165 rozdelenie v\u00fdkonu CPU a GPU tak, aby lep\u0161ie vyhovovali konkr\u00e9tnym pracovn\u00fdm za\u0165a\u017eeniam – \u010di u\u017e sa sna\u017e\u00edte o maxim\u00e1lny po\u010det FPS v hr\u00e1ch alebo r\u00fdchlej\u0161iu produktivitu v kreat\u00edvnych aplik\u00e1ci\u00e1ch. Tieto vylep\u0161enia m\u00f4\u017eu zmeni\u0165 v\u00e1\u0161 prenosn\u00fd hern\u00fd po\u010d\u00edta\u010d. <\/p>\n\n

Kompatibilita s eGPU<\/h2>\n\n

K\u013e\u00fa\u010dov\u00fdm rozdielom je za\u010dlenenie portu OCuLink na GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> spolu s portom USB 4. OCuLink vo v\u0161eobecnosti pon\u00faka v\u00e4\u010d\u0161iu \u0161\u00edrku p\u00e1sma v porovnan\u00ed s USB 4, \u010do vedie k vy\u0161\u0161iemu v\u00fdkonu pri pripojen\u00ed ku kompatibiln\u00fdm eGPU, ako napr. GPD G1<\/a> eGPU dokovacia stanica a najm\u00e4 najnov\u0161\u00ed ONEXGPU 2. <\/p>\n\n

\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 porty 2025 a GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

Na GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> ch\u00fdba port OCuLink, ale napriek tomu podporuje pripojenie eGPU cez port USB 4. Hoci obe zariadenia mo\u017eno pripoji\u0165 k eGPU pre v\u00fdrazn\u00e9 zv\u00fd\u0161enie grafick\u00e9ho v\u00fdkonu (benchmarky Cyberpunk uk\u00e1zali n\u00e1rast FPS na 90+ s GPD G1 a viac ako 120-128 s ONEXGPU 2 pre obe zariadenia cez ich pr\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e9 porty), OCuLink WIN 4 poskytuje vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed v\u00fdkonnostn\u00fd strop najm\u00e4 pre nov\u0161ie eGPU, ako je ONEXPLAYER ONEXGPU 2<\/a>. <\/p>\n

<\/div>\"Dokovacia

Dokovacia stanica GPD G1 (2024) eGPU<\/h2>
607,23 €<\/span><\/span><\/div>
\n\n
\n
Nakupujte teraz<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

Z\u00e1vere\u010dn\u00e9 my\u0161lienky k GPD WIN 4 2025 vs. GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/h2>\n\n

Oba modely GPD WIN 4 2025 vs. GPD WIN Mini 2025 s\u00fa v\u00fdkonn\u00e9 vreckov\u00e9 hern\u00e9 po\u010d\u00edta\u010de, ktor\u00e9 pon\u00fakaj\u00fa zna\u010dn\u00fd v\u00fdkon v\u010faka \u010dipu AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. V\u00fdber medzi nimi sa do ve\u013ekej miery odv\u00edja od preferenci\u00ed tvarov\u00e9ho faktora a prior\u00edt konkr\u00e9tnych funkci\u00ed. <\/p>\n\n

\n
\"Indiana<\/a>
Indiana Jones a Ve\u013ek\u00fd kruh na GPD WIN 4 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"No<\/a>
No Mans Sky na GPD WIN MINI 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n

GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> pon\u00faka tradi\u010dnej\u0161\u00ed, ve\u013emi kompaktn\u00fd prenosn\u00fd po\u010d\u00edta\u010d s kon\u0161trukciou posuvn\u00edka a integrovanou optickou my\u0161ou. Jeho za\u010dlenenie portu OCuLink je v\u00fdznamnou v\u00fdhodou pre pou\u017e\u00edvate\u013eov, ktor\u00ed pl\u00e1nuj\u00fa rozsiahle pou\u017e\u00edvanie eGPU. Je vynikaj\u00facou vo\u013ebou pre t\u00fdch, ktor\u00ed uprednost\u0148uj\u00fa maxim\u00e1lnu prenosnos\u0165 v zn\u00e1mom handheldovom usporiadan\u00ed a potenci\u00e1lne vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed v\u00fdkon eGPU v prenosnom hernom po\u010d\u00edta\u010di. <\/p>\n\n

\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 vs. GPD WIN Mini 2025. Ktor\u00fd by ste si vybrali? <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n

GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> poskytuje z\u00e1\u017eitok z mini notebooku s v\u00e4\u010d\u0161\u00edm 7-palcov\u00fdm 120 Hz displejom s vy\u0161\u0161ou obnovovacou frekvenciou a pohodln\u00fdm dizajnom v tvare \u0161krupiny, ktor\u00fd chr\u00e1ni obrazovku a kl\u00e1vesnicu. Jeho s\u00fa\u010das\u0165ou je touchpad, ktor\u00fd zvy\u0161uje pou\u017eite\u013enos\u0165 pri in\u00fdch ako hern\u00fdch \u00faloh\u00e1ch. Hoci je o nie\u010do v\u00e4\u010d\u0161\u00ed, je \u013eah\u0161\u00ed a pravdepodobne dosahuje skvel\u00fa rovnov\u00e1hu medzi ve\u013ekos\u0165ou obrazovky a prenosnos\u0165ou, pri\u010dom sa zmest\u00ed do vrecka bundy. Jeho v\u00fdkon v benchmarkoch, najm\u00e4 pri vy\u0161\u0161\u00edch TDP, bol \u010dasto ozna\u010dovan\u00fd za \u0161pi\u010dkov\u00fd, a to aj napriek ch\u00fdbaj\u00facemu OCuLink. To z neho rob\u00ed jeden z najvyv\u00e1\u017eenej\u0161\u00edch kompaktn\u00fdch hern\u00fdch po\u010d\u00edta\u010dov, ktor\u00e9 s\u00fa v s\u00fa\u010dasnosti k dispoz\u00edcii. <\/p>\n\n

\n
K\u00daPI\u0164 GPD WIN 4 2025 TU<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
K\u00daPI\u0164 GPD WIN MINI 2025 TU<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
\n